9 Comments
User's avatar
imajinl's avatar

nice write up!

Expand full comment
Dmitry's avatar

:)

Expand full comment
Dee Sentralised's avatar

You consistently put out good commentary and intelligent pro-crypto viewpoints. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Dmitry's avatar

much appreciated good sir. my pleasure!

Expand full comment
Bowtied Shrike's avatar

Okra down bad by hammer test

Expand full comment
Barca's avatar

Fiat currencies have IV: they are the only way to extinguish tax liabilities.

Expand full comment
Dmitry's avatar

what you're describing is extrinsic value, not intrinsic. meaning it only has utility that someone imposes on you. I don't deny there's use there, but it's not innate to the item. any mafia that forces you to tithe in something would give it extrinsic value.

this is not an "is this useful" analysis, it's a "does this thing have innate value" one.

Expand full comment
Barca's avatar

No when you're talking about objective value and not referencing market price you're talking about IV. Fiat has an objective measure of value in that it has the ability to satisfy the sovereign. Call them a mafia if you want but it's always been like that and always will. Crypto like tulip bulbs are fundamentally different things.

Expand full comment
Dmitry's avatar

"it's valuable because someone makes me tithe in it" = this is definitionally extrinsic value. "this thing is useful" is not the measure for *intrinsic* value.

idk what ferreting in the word "objective" is doing here; it has nothing to do with the origins of the value and how it's derived.

IV vs EV definitions: https://twitter.com/BackTheBunny/status/1765821639470854478

Expand full comment